netdev - Re: [PATCH 07/31] netfilter: ctnetlink: Support L3 protocol-filter on flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 May 2019 10:09:56 +0200
From:   Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@...il.com>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:     Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Netfilter Development Mailing list 
        <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/31] netfilter: ctnetlink: Support L3 protocol-filter on flush

Hi,

On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 9:46 AM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
>
> Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote:
> > I understand your point, but this is a regression. Ignoring a field/attribute of
> > a netlink message is part of the uAPI. This field exists for more than a decade
> > (probably two), so you cannot just use it because nobody was using it. Just see
> > all discussions about strict validation of netlink messages.
> > Moreover, the conntrack tool exists also for ages and is an official tool.
>
> FWIW I agree with Nicolas, we should restore old behaviour and flush
> everything when AF_INET is given.  We can add new netlink attr to
> restrict this.

I agree with both of you. Unless anyone beats me to it, I will try to
have a fix ready during the weekend.

BR,
Kristian