netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 13/17] s390: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 09:50:21 -0400
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Cc:     alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 13/17] s390: bpf: eliminate zero extension
 code-gen



On 5/3/19 9:41 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 11:42:40AM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> When sending patches which affect s390, could you please add Martin
> and me on cc to _all_ patches? We now received only the cover-letter
> plus one patch. It's always hard in such cirumstances to figure out if
> the code is doing the right thing.
> 
>
One possible way is to use  --signed-off-by-cc option in git send-email

       --[no-]signed-off-by-cc
           If this is set, add emails found in Signed-off-by: or Cc: lines to the cc list.
           Default is the value of sendemail.signedoffbycc configuration value; if that is
           unspecified, default to --signed-off-by-cc.