[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6f20a1f-d86d-b735-e359-5ae7d2d8c546@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 13:13:59 -0400
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stfan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ip6: fix skb leak in ip6frag_expire_frag_queue()
On 5/3/19 11:58 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 8:52 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:33 AM Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This skb_get was introduced by commit 05c0b86b9696802fd0ce5676a92a63f1b455bdf3
>>> "ipv6: frags: rewrite ip6_expire_frag_queue()", and the rbtree patch
>>> is not in 4.4, where the bug is reported at.
>>> Shouldn't the "Fixes" tag also reference the original patch?
>>
>> No, this bug really fixes a memory leak.
>>
>> Fact that it also fixes the XFRM issue is secondary, since all your
>> patches are being backported in stable
>> trees anyway for other reasons.
>
> There are no plans to backport rbtree patches to 4.4 and earlier at
> the moment, afaik.
>
No problem, I mentioned to Stefan what needs to be done.
(removing the head skb, removing the skb_get())
Powered by blists - more mailing lists