netdev - Re: CVE-2019-11683

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 4 May 2019 18:39:15 +0200
From:   Reindl Harald <h.reindl@...lounge.net>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CVE-2019-11683



Am 04.05.19 um 18:32 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> On 5/4/19 12:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> ok, so the answer is no
>>
>> what's the point then release every 2 days a new "stable" kernel?
>> even distributions like Fedora are not able to cope with that
> 
> That is a question for distros, not for netdev@ ?

maybe, but the point is that we go in a direction where you have every 2
or 3 days a "stable" update up to days where at 9:00 AM a "stable" point
release appears at kernel.org and one hour later the next one from Linus
himself to fix a regression in the release an hour ago

release-realy-release-often is fine, but that smells like rush and
nobody downstream be it a sysadmin or a distribution can cope with that
when you are in a testing stage a while start deploy there are 2 new
releases with a long changelog

just because you never know if what you intended to deploy now better
should be skipped or joust go ahead because the next one a few days
later brings a regression and which ones are the regressions adn which
ones are the fixes which for me personally now leads to just randomly
update every few weaks