lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190504164404.GB21656@t480s.localdomain> Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 16:44:04 -0400 From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com> To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/9] net: dsa: Call driver's setup callback after setting up its switchdev notifier On Sat, 4 May 2019 16:59:11 +0300, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote: > This allows the driver to perform some manipulations of its own during > setup, using generic switchdev calls. Having the notifiers registered at > setup time is important because otherwise any switchdev transaction > emitted during this time would be ignored (dispatched to an empty call > chain). > > One current usage scenario is for the driver to request DSA to set up > 802.1Q based switch tagging for its ports. > > There is no danger for the driver setup code to start racing now with > switchdev events emitted from the network stack (such as bridge core) > even if the notifier is registered earlier. This is because the network > stack needs a net_device as a vehicle to perform switchdev operations, > and the slave net_devices are registered later than the core driver > setup anyway (ds->ops->setup in dsa_switch_setup vs dsa_port_setup). > > Luckily DSA doesn't need a net_device to carry out switchdev callbacks, > and therefore drivers shouldn't assume either that net_devices are > available at the time their switchdev callbacks get invoked. > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> > Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists