[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hrUhts6OWC6e7EtyaapTJGb1f1xO_ybuSn949rBqfUcag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 02:23:35 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/9] net: dsa: Allow drivers to filter packets
they can decode source port from
On Sun, 5 May 2019 at 01:49, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> On Sat, 4 May 2019 16:59:13 +0300, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
> > Frames get processed by DSA and redirected to switch port net devices
> > based on the ETH_P_XDSA multiplexed packet_type handler found by the
> > network stack when calling eth_type_trans().
> >
> > The running assumption is that once the DSA .rcv function is called, DSA
> > is always able to decode the switch tag in order to change the skb->dev
> > from its master.
> >
> > However there are tagging protocols (such as the new DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1105,
> > user of DSA_TAG_PROTO_8021Q) where this assumption is not completely
> > true, since switch tagging piggybacks on the absence of a vlan_filtering
> > bridge. Moreover, management traffic (BPDU, PTP) for this switch doesn't
> > rely on switch tagging, but on a different mechanism. So it would make
> > sense to at least be able to terminate that.
> >
> > Having DSA receive traffic it can't decode would put it in an impossible
> > situation: the eth_type_trans() function would invoke the DSA .rcv(),
> > which could not change skb->dev, then eth_type_trans() would be invoked
> > again, which again would call the DSA .rcv, and the packet would never
> > be able to exit the DSA filter and would spiral in a loop until the
> > whole system dies.
> >
> > This happens because eth_type_trans() doesn't actually look at the skb
> > (so as to identify a potential tag) when it deems it as being
> > ETH_P_XDSA. It just checks whether skb->dev has a DSA private pointer
> > installed (therefore it's a DSA master) and that there exists a .rcv
> > callback (everybody except DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE has that). This is
> > understandable as there are many switch tags out there, and exhaustively
> > checking for all of them is far from ideal.
> >
> > The solution lies in introducing a filtering function for each tagging
> > protocol. In the absence of a filtering function, all traffic is passed
> > to the .rcv DSA callback. The tagging protocol should see the filtering
> > function as a pre-validation that it can decode the incoming skb. The
> > traffic that doesn't match the filter will bypass the DSA .rcv callback
> > and be left on the master netdevice, which wasn't previously possible.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
>
> Looks promising, I'll try to give this a try soon!
>
> Thanks,
> Vivien
Hi Vivien,
Thanks but what do you mean by trying it out?
-Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists