netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: via-rhine: net: Fix a resource leak in rhine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <477140c2-841c-616f-fa25-faa428381111@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 4 May 2019 11:57:39 +0800
From:   Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: via-rhine: net: Fix a resource leak in rhine_init()



On 2019/5/4 11:41, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 11:23:06 +0800
>
>>
>> On 2019/5/4 11:13, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
>>> Date: Sat,  4 May 2019 11:08:13 +0800
>>>
>>>> When platform_driver_register() fails, pci_unregister_driver() is not
>>>> called to release the resource allocated by pci_register_driver().
>>>>
>>>> To fix this bug, error handling code for platform_driver_register()
>>>> and
>>>> pci_register_driver() is separately implemented.
>>>>
>>>> This bug is found by a runtime fuzzing tool named FIZZER written by
>>>> us.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
>>> I think the idea here is that PCI is not enabled in the kernel, it is
>>> fine for the pci register to fail and only the platform register to
>>> succeed.
>>>
>>> You are breaking that.
>> Okay, I can understand it.
>> If so, I think that platform_driver_register() should be called before
>> pci_register_driver(), and it is still necessary to separately handle
>> their errors.
>> If you agree, I will send a v2 patch.
> It is only a failure if both fail.
>
> If at least one succeeds, the driver can potentially probe properly.

Thanks for the explanation, I understand now :)
The code logic seems a little strange, but it should be correct in 
rhine_init()...
If so, if one fails, I wonder whether it is correct for rhine_cleanup() 
to call both platform_driver_unregister() and pci_unregister_driver()?


Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai