[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e47117d6-f918-1dd0-834e-d056534bfead@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 13:02:25 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>, ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com,
kvalo@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ath9k: Return an error when
ath9k_hw_reset() fails
On 04.05.2019 12:08, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> ath9k_hw_reset() in ath9k_start() can fail, and in this case,
> ath9k_start() should return an error instead of executing the
> subsequent code.
>
Such mechanical patches w/o understanding the code are always
problematic. Do you have any proof that this error is fatal?
I think it is not, else we wouldn't have this line:
ah->reset_power_on = false;
Also you should consider that a mutex and a spinlock are held.
Maybe changing the error message to a warning would be more
appropriate. But this I would leave to somebody being more
familiar with this driver.
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> index f23cb2f3d296..f78e7c46764d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> @@ -681,6 +681,7 @@ static int ath9k_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
> "Unable to reset hardware; reset status %d (freq %u MHz)\n",
> r, curchan->center_freq);
> ah->reset_power_on = false;
> + return r;
> }
>
> /* Setup our intr mask. */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists