[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 12:23:14 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk>
Cc: "xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next v2] net: sched: Introduce act_ctinfo action
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 10:15:43AM +0000, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/net/sched/act_ctinfo.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,407 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note
How can a .c file, buried in the kernel tree, have a Linux-syscall-note
exception to it?
Are you _sure_ that is ok? That license should only be for files in the
uapi header directory.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists