[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8736lt9o6v.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 12:43:20 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: "xiyou.wangcong\@gmail.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"davem\@davemloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"jhs\@mojatatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
"jiri\@resnulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"shuah\@kernel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next v2] net: sched: Introduce act_ctinfo action
Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk> writes:
>> On 5 May 2019, at 11:23, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 10:15:43AM +0000, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/net/sched/act_ctinfo.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,407 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note
>>
>
> Hey Greg, thanks for the review.
>
>> How can a .c file, buried in the kernel tree, have a Linux-syscall-note
>> exception to it?
>
> Because I’m a moron and nobody else spotted it.
>>
>> Are you _sure_ that is ok? That license should only be for files in the
>> uapi header directory.
>
> Expect a v3 shortly. I shall wear your chastisement with honour :-)
While you're at it, you don't actually need the GPL text blob when using
the SPDX headers... :)
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists