netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] of_net: Add NVMEM support to of_get_mac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190506161917.GH81826@meh.true.cz>
Date:   Mon, 6 May 2019 18:19:17 +0200
From:   Petr Štetiar <ynezz@...e.cz>
To:     Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, frowand.list@...il.com,
        srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, maxime.ripard@...tlin.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] of_net: Add NVMEM support to of_get_mac_address

Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com> [2019-05-06 16:41:32]:

Hi Maxime,

> On Mon, 6 May 2019 10:32:07 +0200
> Petr Štetiar <ynezz@...e.cz> wrote:
> 
> >David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> [2019-05-05 21:47:27]:
> >
> >Hi David,
> >
> >> Series applied, thank you.  
> >
> >I did probably something terribly wrong, but patch "[PATCH v4 05/10] net:
> >ethernet: support of_get_mac_address new ERR_PTR error" has not reached the
> >patchwork, but I'm sure, that it was sent out as Hauke Mehrtens (maintainer
> >for ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c) has confirmed to me on IRC, that he has received
> >it.
> 
> It seems indeed that the 5th patch hasn't beed applied, which effectively
> breaks mvneta on net-next, and I guess a lot of other drivers that rely
> on handling the new return values.

Yep, sorry for that.

> I saw you sent a followup series fixing that, but only patch 2/3
> shows-up on netdev, so you might be facing a similar issue here.

Indeed, seems like patchwork hiccup with a long list of recepients in the
To/Cc headers, so I've just resend it again with only netdev@...r.kernel.org
in the To: header and it was happily picked up[1].

1. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=106369

-- ynezz