netdev - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 79/81] NFC: nci: Add some bounds checking in nci_hci_cmd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue,  7 May 2019 01:35:50 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 79/81] NFC: nci: Add some bounds checking in nci_hci_cmd_received()

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

[ Upstream commit d7ee81ad09f072eab1681877fc71ec05f9c1ae92 ]

This is similar to commit 674d9de02aa7 ("NFC: Fix possible memory
corruption when handling SHDLC I-Frame commands").

I'm not totally sure, but I think that commit description may have
overstated the danger.  I was under the impression that this data came
from the firmware?  If you can't trust your networking firmware, then
you're already in trouble.

Anyway, these days we add bounds checking where ever we can and we call
it kernel hardening.  Better safe than sorry.

Fixes: 11f54f228643 ("NFC: nci: Add HCI over NCI protocol support")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
---
 net/nfc/nci/hci.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
index ddfc52ac1f9b..c0d323b58e73 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
@@ -312,6 +312,10 @@ static void nci_hci_cmd_received(struct nci_dev *ndev, u8 pipe,
 		create_info = (struct nci_hci_create_pipe_resp *)skb->data;
 		dest_gate = create_info->dest_gate;
 		new_pipe = create_info->pipe;
+		if (new_pipe >= NCI_HCI_MAX_PIPES) {
+			status = NCI_HCI_ANY_E_NOK;
+			goto exit;
+		}
 
 		/* Save the new created pipe and bind with local gate,
 		 * the description for skb->data[3] is destination gate id
@@ -336,6 +340,10 @@ static void nci_hci_cmd_received(struct nci_dev *ndev, u8 pipe,
 			goto exit;
 		}
 		delete_info = (struct nci_hci_delete_pipe_noti *)skb->data;
+		if (delete_info->pipe >= NCI_HCI_MAX_PIPES) {
+			status = NCI_HCI_ANY_E_NOK;
+			goto exit;
+		}
 
 		ndev->hci_dev->pipes[delete_info->pipe].gate =
 						NCI_HCI_INVALID_GATE;
-- 
2.20.1