netdev - Re: [PATCH net V2] tuntap: synchronize through tfiles array instead of tun->numqueues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190508001518-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 8 May 2019 00:16:11 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        "weiyongjun (A)" <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2] tuntap: synchronize through tfiles array instead
 of tun->numqueues

On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 12:03:36AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
> When a queue(tfile) is detached through __tun_detach(), we move the
> last enabled tfile to the position where detached one sit but don't
> NULL out last position. We expect to synchronize the datapath through
> tun->numqueues. Unfortunately, this won't work since we're lacking
> sufficient mechanism to order or synchronize the access to
> tun->numqueues.
> 
> To fix this, NULL out the last position during detaching and check
> RCU protected tfile against NULL instead of checking tun->numqueues in
> datapath.
> 
> Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> Cc: weiyongjun (A) <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Fixes: c8d68e6be1c3b ("tuntap: multiqueue support")
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> Changes from V1:
> - keep the check in tun_xdp_xmit()
> ---
>  drivers/net/tun.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index e9ca1c0..32a0b23 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -700,6 +700,8 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
>  				   tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues - 1]);
>  		ntfile = rtnl_dereference(tun->tfiles[index]);
>  		ntfile->queue_index = index;
> +		rcu_assign_pointer(tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues - 1],
> +				   NULL);
>  
>  		--tun->numqueues;
>  		if (clean) {
> @@ -1082,7 +1084,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  	tfile = rcu_dereference(tun->tfiles[txq]);
>  
>  	/* Drop packet if interface is not attached */
> -	if (txq >= tun->numqueues)
> +	if (!tfile)
>  		goto drop;
>  
>  	if (!rcu_dereference(tun->steering_prog))

Hmm don't we need to range check txq?


> @@ -1313,6 +1315,10 @@ static int tun_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev, int n,
>  
>  	tfile = rcu_dereference(tun->tfiles[smp_processor_id() %
>  					    numqueues]);
> +	if (!tfile) {
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +		return -ENXIO; /* Caller will free/return all frames */
> +	}
>  
>  	spin_lock(&tfile->tx_ring.producer_lock);
>  	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1