[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190509180005.GA16272@Red>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 20:00:05 +0200
From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: stmmac: Selftests
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:11:53AM +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:04:16
>
> > What means 1 for "Perfect Filter UC" ?
>
> Thank you for the testing :)
>
> 1 means that either the expected packet was not received or that the
> filter did not work.
>
> For GMAC there is the need to set the HPF bit in order for the test to
> pass. Do you have such bit in your HW ? It should be in EMAC_RX_FRM_FLT
> register.
The problem was missing IFF_UNICAST_FLT, so netcore put the device in promiscous when adding an unicast address.
Next step will be to enable Flow Control, but I will start a new thread for that.
>
> > I have added my patch below
>
> Do you want me to add your patch to the series ? If you send me with
> git-send-email I can apply it with your SoB.
>
I will do.
I will send the patch for IFF_UNICAST_FLT appart since it fixes a bug.
Regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists