netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: stmmac: Selftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 May 2019 20:00:05 +0200
From:   Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To:     Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: stmmac: Selftests

On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:11:53AM +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:04:16
> 
> > What means 1 for "Perfect Filter UC" ?
> 
> Thank you for the testing :)
> 
> 1 means that either the expected packet was not received or that the 
> filter did not work.
> 
> For GMAC there is the need to set the HPF bit in order for the test to 
> pass. Do you have such bit in your HW ? It should be in EMAC_RX_FRM_FLT 
> register.

The problem was missing IFF_UNICAST_FLT, so netcore put the device in promiscous when adding an unicast address.

Next step will be to enable Flow Control, but I will start a new thread for that.

> 
> > I have added my patch below
> 
> Do you want me to add your patch to the series ? If you send me with 
> git-send-email I can apply it with your SoB.
> 

I will do.
I will send the patch for IFF_UNICAST_FLT appart since it fixes a bug.

Regards