netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with the ipsec tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 May 2019 11:20:37 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with the ipsec
 tree

Hi Dave,

On Wed, 1 May 2019 13:01:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:41:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   8742dc86d0c7 ("xfrm4: Fix uninitialized memory read in _decode_session4")
> > 
> > from the ipsec tree and commit:
> > 
> >   c53ac41e3720 ("xfrm: remove decode_session indirection from afinfo_policy")
> > 
> > from the ipsec-next tree.
> > 
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:37:41 +1000
> > Subject: [PATCH] xfrm4: fix up for moved _decode_session4
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > ---
> >  net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> > index 410233c5681e..7a43ae6b2a44 100644
> > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> > @@ -3264,7 +3264,8 @@ static void
> >  decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> >  {
> >  	const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> > -	u8 *xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> > +	int ihl = iph->ihl;
> > +	u8 *xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> >  	struct flowi4 *fl4 = &fl->u.ip4;
> >  	int oif = 0;
> >  
> > @@ -3275,6 +3276,11 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> >  	fl4->flowi4_mark = skb->mark;
> >  	fl4->flowi4_oif = reverse ? skb->skb_iif : oif;
> >  
> > +	fl4->flowi4_proto = iph->protocol;
> > +	fl4->daddr = reverse ? iph->saddr : iph->daddr;
> > +	fl4->saddr = reverse ? iph->daddr : iph->saddr;
> > +	fl4->flowi4_tos = iph->tos;
> > +
> >  	if (!ip_is_fragment(iph)) {
> >  		switch (iph->protocol) {
> >  		case IPPROTO_UDP:
> > @@ -3286,7 +3292,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> >  			    pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 4 - skb->data)) {
> >  				__be16 *ports;
> >  
> > -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> > +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> >  				ports = (__be16 *)xprth;
> >  
> >  				fl4->fl4_sport = ports[!!reverse];
> > @@ -3298,7 +3304,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> >  			    pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 2 - skb->data)) {
> >  				u8 *icmp;
> >  
> > -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> > +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> >  				icmp = xprth;
> >  
> >  				fl4->fl4_icmp_type = icmp[0];
> > @@ -3310,7 +3316,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> >  			    pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 4 - skb->data)) {
> >  				__be32 *ehdr;
> >  
> > -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> > +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> >  				ehdr = (__be32 *)xprth;
> >  
> >  				fl4->fl4_ipsec_spi = ehdr[0];
> > @@ -3321,7 +3327,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> >  			    pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 8 - skb->data)) {
> >  				__be32 *ah_hdr;
> >  
> > -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> > +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> >  				ah_hdr = (__be32 *)xprth;
> >  
> >  				fl4->fl4_ipsec_spi = ah_hdr[1];
> > @@ -3332,7 +3338,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> >  			    pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 4 - skb->data)) {
> >  				__be16 *ipcomp_hdr;
> >  
> > -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> > +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> >  				ipcomp_hdr = (__be16 *)xprth;
> >  
> >  				fl4->fl4_ipsec_spi = htonl(ntohs(ipcomp_hdr[1]));
> > @@ -3344,7 +3350,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> >  				__be16 *greflags;
> >  				__be32 *gre_hdr;
> >  
> > -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> > +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> >  				greflags = (__be16 *)xprth;
> >  				gre_hdr = (__be32 *)xprth;
> >  
> > @@ -3360,10 +3366,6 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > -	fl4->flowi4_proto = iph->protocol;
> > -	fl4->daddr = reverse ? iph->saddr : iph->daddr;
> > -	fl4->saddr = reverse ? iph->daddr : iph->saddr;
> > -	fl4->flowi4_tos = iph->tos;
> >  }
> >  
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)  
> 
> This is now a conflict between the net and net-next trees.

It looks like this fixup has been missed in Linus' merge of the
net-next tree ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped