lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <771b21d6-3b1e-c118-2907-5b5782f7cb92@6wind.com> Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 17:13:36 +0200 From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Dan Winship <danw@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] rtnetlink: always put ILFA_LINK for links with a link-netnsid Le 13/05/2019 à 17:08, Sabrina Dubroca a écrit : > 2019-05-13, 16:50:51 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: >> Le 13/05/2019 à 15:47, Sabrina Dubroca a écrit : >>> Currently, nla_put_iflink() doesn't put the IFLA_LINK attribute when >>> iflink == ifindex. >>> >>> In some cases, a device can be created in a different netns with the >>> same ifindex as its parent. That device will not dump its IFLA_LINK >>> attribute, which can confuse some userspace software that expects it. >>> For example, if the last ifindex created in init_net and foo are both >>> 8, these commands will trigger the issue: >>> >>> ip link add parent type dummy # ifindex 9 >>> ip link add link parent netns foo type macvlan # ifindex 9 in ns foo >>> >>> So, in case a device puts the IFLA_LINK_NETNSID attribute in a dump, >>> always put the IFLA_LINK attribute as well. >>> >>> Thanks to Dan Winship for analyzing the original OpenShift bug down to >>> the missing netlink attribute. >>> >>> Analyzed-by: Dan Winship <danw@...hat.com> >>> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") >> I would say: >> Fixes: 5e6700b3bf98 ("sit: add support of x-netns") >> >> Because before this patch, there was no device with an iflink that can be put in >> another netns. > > That tells us how far back we might want to backport this fix, but not > which commit introduced the bug. I think Fixes should refer to the > introduction of the faulty code, not to what patch made it visible (if > we can find both). No sure to follow you. The problem you describe cannot happen before commit 5e6700b3bf98, so there cannot be a "faulty" patch before that commit. Anyway, both commits are very old, so it doesn't matter. Thank you, Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists