netdev - [PATCH bpf v1 0/3] Test the 32bit narrow reads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190515134731.12611-1-krzesimir@kinvolk.io>
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 15:47:25 +0200
From:   Krzesimir Nowak <krzesimir@...volk.io>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     iago@...volk.io, alban@...volk.io,
        Krzesimir Nowak <krzesimir@...volk.io>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>,
        Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf v1 0/3] Test the 32bit narrow reads

These patches try to test the fix made in commit e2f7fc0ac695 ("bpf:
fix undefined behavior in narrow load handling"). The problem existed
in the generated BPF bytecode that was doing a 32bit narrow read of a
64bit field, so to test it the code would need to be executed.
Currently the only such field exists in BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT,
which is not supported by bpf_prog_test_run().

First commit adds the test, but since I can't run it, I'm not sure if
it is even valid (because endianness, for example). Second commit adds
a message to test_verifier when it couldn't run the program because of
lack permissions or program type being not supported. Third commit
fixes a possible problem with errno.

With these patches, I get the following output on my test:

/kernel/tools/testing/selftests/bpf$ sudo ./test_verifier 920 920
#920/p 32bit loads of a 64bit field (both least and most significant words) Did not run the program (not supported) OK
Summary: 1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

So it looks like I need to pick a different approach.

Krzesimir Nowak (3):
  selftests/bpf: Test correctness of narrow 32bit read on 64bit field
  selftests/bpf: Print a message when tester could not run a program
  selftests/bpf: Avoid a clobbering of errno

 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c   | 19 +++++++++++++++----
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c  | 15 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1