netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf v1 2/3] selftests/bpf: Print a message when tester could not run a program

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGGp+cGN+YYVjJee5ba84HstSrHGurBvwmKmzNsFRvb344Df3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 11:29:39 +0200
From:   Krzesimir Nowak <krzesimir@...volk.io>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Iago López Galeiras <iago@...volk.io>,
        "Alban Crequy (Kinvolk)" <alban@...volk.io>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v1 2/3] selftests/bpf: Print a message when tester
 could not run a program

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:46 PM Jakub Kicinski
<jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2019 15:47:27 +0200, Krzesimir Nowak wrote:
> > This prints a message when the error is about program type being not
> > supported by the test runner or because of permissions problem. This
> > is to see if the program we expected to run was actually executed.
> >
> > The messages are open-coded because strerror(ENOTSUPP) returns
> > "Unknown error 524".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzesimir Nowak <krzesimir@...volk.io>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> > index ccd896b98cac..bf0da03f593b 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> > @@ -825,11 +825,20 @@ static int do_prog_test_run(int fd_prog, bool unpriv, uint32_t expected_val,
> >                               tmp, &size_tmp, &retval, NULL);
> >       if (unpriv)
> >               set_admin(false);
> > -     if (err && errno != 524/*ENOTSUPP*/ && errno != EPERM) {
> > -             printf("Unexpected bpf_prog_test_run error ");
> > -             return err;
> > +     if (err) {
> > +             switch (errno) {
> > +             case 524/*ENOTSUPP*/:
> > +                     printf("Did not run the program (not supported) ");
> > +                     return 0;
> > +             case EPERM:
> > +                     printf("Did not run the program (no permission) ");
> > +                     return 0;
>
> Perhaps use strerror(errno)?

As I said in the commit message, I open-coded those messages because
strerror for ENOTSUPP returns "Unknown error 524".

>
> > +             default:
> > +                     printf("Unexpected bpf_prog_test_run error ");
> > +                     return err;
> > +             }
> >       }
> > -     if (!err && retval != expected_val &&
> > +     if (retval != expected_val &&
> >           expected_val != POINTER_VALUE) {
> >               printf("FAIL retval %d != %d ", retval, expected_val);
> >               return 1;
>


-- 
Kinvolk GmbH | Adalbertstr.6a, 10999 Berlin | tel: +491755589364
Geschäftsführer/Directors: Alban Crequy, Chris Kühl, Iago López Galeiras
Registergericht/Court of registration: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg
Registernummer/Registration number: HRB 171414 B
Ust-ID-Nummer/VAT ID number: DE302207000