netdev - Re: 5.1 `ip route get addr/cidr` regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 May 2019 22:19:23 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        emersonbernier@...anota.com, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, piraty1@...ox.ru
Subject: Re: 5.1 `ip route get addr/cidr` regression

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 7:39 PM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> Not sure why Jason is not seeing that. Really odd that he hits the error
> AND does not get a message back since it requires an updated ip command
> to set the strict checking flag and that command understands extack.
> Perhaps no libmnl?

Right, no libmnl. This is coming out of the iproute2 compiled for the
tests at https://www.wireguard.com/build-status/ which are pretty
minimal. Extact support would be kind of useful for diagnostics, and
wg(8) already uses it, so I can probably put that in my build system.