netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] flow_offload: Re-add per-action statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <17cf3488-6f17-cb59-42a3-6b73f7a0091e@solarflare.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 May 2019 17:10:42 +0100
From:   Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@...filter.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] flow_offload: Re-add per-action
 statistics

On 20/05/2019 16:38, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> That is fine then if i could do:
>
> tc actions add action drop index 104
> then
> followed by for example the two filters you show below..
That seems to work.

> Is your hardware not using explicit indices into a stats table?
No; we ask the HW to allocate a counter and it returns us a counter ID (which
 bears no relation to the action index).  So I have an rhashtable keyed on
 the cookie (or on the action-type & action_index, when using the other
 version of my patches) which stores the HW counter ID; and the entry in that
 hashtable is what I attach to the driver's action struct.

> Beauty.  Assuming the stats are being synced to the kernel?
> Test 1:
> What does "tc -s actions ls action drop index 104" show?
It produces no output, but
    `tc -s actions get action drop index 104`
or
    `tc -s actions list action gact index 104`
shows the same stats as `tc -s filter show ...` did for that action.
> Test 2:
> Delete one of the filters above then dump actions again as above.
Ok, that's weird: after I delete one, the other (in `tc -s filter show ...`)
 no longer shows the shared action.

# tc filter del dev $vfrep parent ffff: pref 49151
# tc -stats filter show dev $vfrep parent ffff:
filter protocol arp pref 49152 flower chain 0
filter protocol arp pref 49152 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
  eth_type arp
  skip_sw
  in_hw in_hw_count 1
        action order 1: vlan  push id 100 protocol 802.1Q priority 0 pipe
         index 1 ref 1 bind 1 installed 180 sec used 180 sec
        Action statistics:
        Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
        backlog 0b 0p requeues 0

        action order 2: mirred (Egress Mirror to device $pf) pipe
        index 101 ref 1 bind 1 installed 180 sec used 169 sec
        Action statistics:
        Sent 256 bytes 4 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
        Sent software 0 bytes 0 pkt
        Sent hardware 256 bytes 4 pkt
        backlog 0b 0p requeues 0

        action order 3: vlan  pop pipe
         index 2 ref 1 bind 1 installed 180 sec used 180 sec
        Action statistics:
        Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
        backlog 0b 0p requeues 0

#

Yet `tc -s actions get` still shows it...

# tc -s actions get action drop index 104
total acts 0

        action order 1: gact action drop
         random type none pass val 0
         index 104 ref 2 bind 1 installed 812 sec used 797 sec
        Action statistics:
        Sent 534 bytes 7 pkt (dropped 7, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
        Sent software 0 bytes 0 pkt
        Sent hardware 534 bytes 7 pkt
        backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
# tc filter show dev $vfrep parent ffff:
filter protocol arp pref 49152 flower chain 0
filter protocol arp pref 49152 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
  eth_type arp
  skip_sw
  in_hw in_hw_count 1
        action order 1: vlan  push id 100 protocol 802.1Q priority 0 pipe
         index 1 ref 1 bind 1

        action order 3: vlan  pop pipe
         index 2 ref 1 bind 1

# tc -s actions get action mirred index 101
total acts 0

        action order 1: mirred (Egress Mirror to device $pf) pipe
        index 101 ref 1 bind 1 installed 796 sec used 785 sec
        Action statistics:
        Sent 256 bytes 4 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
        Sent software 0 bytes 0 pkt
        Sent hardware 256 bytes 4 pkt
        backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
#

Curiouser and curiouser... it seems that after I delete one of the rules,
 TC starts to get very confused and actions start disappearing from rule
 dumps.  Yet those actions still exist according to `tc actions list`.
I don't *think* my changes can have caused this, but I'll try a test on a
 vanilla kernel just to make sure the same thing happens there.

-Ed