lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3878056.TXPIU5uV5l@rocinante.m.i2n>
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 17:42:37 +0200
From:   Juliana Rodrigueiro <juliana.rodrigueiro@...ra2net.com>
To:     "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@...el.com>
Cc:     intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, thomas.jarosch@...ra2net.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e1000e: Work around hardware unit hang by disabling TSO

Hello Sasha,

On Wednesday, 15 May 2019 07:39:46 CEST Neftin, Sasha wrote:
> You are right, in some particular configurations e1000e devices stuck at
> Tx hang while TCP segmentation offload is on. But for all other users we
> should keep the TCP segmentation option is enabled as default. I suggest
> to use 'ethtool' command: ethtool -K <adapter> tso on/off to workaround
> Tx hang in your situation.
> Thanks,
> Sasha

thank you for your reply.

I did consider using "ethtool" to disable TSO for my use cases. However, I 
have no guarantees that a machine with the PCH2 device will not hang and 
render my system inaccessible before anything in userspace runs. No amount of 
connection outage is acceptable.

The problem escalates when we take into consideration that the exact 
circumstances that bring the device into an unrecoverable state don't seem to 
be known even by the Intel developers themselves.

This patch keeps the problematic device stable for all configurations.

So I ask myself, how actually feasible is it to gamble the usage of "ethtool" 
to turn on or off TSO every time the network configuration changes?

Why should we let the users run into an open knife instead of preemptively fix 
a known hardware bug via the kernel? Otherwise all Linux distributions would 
need to apply the magic ethtool fix for this specific PCI id.

Best regards,
Juliana


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ