[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190522095730.047ad08f@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 09:57:30 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Beckett <david.beckett@...ronome.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [bpf PATCH v4 1/4] bpf: tls, implement unhash to avoid
transition out of ESTABLISHED
On Thu, 09 May 2019 21:57:49 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> It is possible (via shutdown()) for TCP socks to go through TCP_CLOSE
> state via tcp_disconnect() without calling into close callback. This
> would allow a kTLS enabled socket to exist outside of ESTABLISHED
> state which is not supported.
>
> Solve this the same way we solved the sock{map|hash} case by adding
> an unhash hook to remove tear down the TLS state.
>
> In the process we also make the close hook more robust. We add a put
> call into the close path, also in the unhash path, to remove the
> reference to ulp data after free. Its no longer valid and may confuse
> things later if the socket (re)enters kTLS code paths. Second we add
> an 'if(ctx)' check to ensure the ctx is still valid and not released
> from a previous unhash/close path.
>
> Fixes: d91c3e17f75f2 ("net/tls: Only attach to sockets in ESTABLISHED state")
> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Looks like David Beckett managed to trigger another nasty on the
release path :/
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000012
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted
5.2.0-rc1-00139-g14629453a6d3 #21 RIP: 0010:tcp_peek_len+0x10/0x60
RSP: 0018:ffffc02e41c54b98 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9cf924c4e030 RCX: 0000000000000051
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: ffff9cf97128f480
RBP: ffff9cf9365e0300 R08: ffff9cf94fe7d2c0 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000000000036b R11: ffff9cf939735e00 R12: ffff9cf91ad9ae40
R13: ffff9cf924c4e000 R14: ffff9cf9a8fcbaae R15: 0000000000000020
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9cf9af7c0000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0:
0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000012 CR3: 000000013920a003 CR4:
00000000003606e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400 Call Trace:
<IRQ>
strp_data_ready+0x48/0x90
tls_data_ready+0x22/0xd0 [tls]
tcp_rcv_established+0x569/0x620
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x127/0x1e0
tcp_v4_rcv+0xad7/0xbf0
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x2c/0x1c0
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x41/0x50
ip_local_deliver+0x6b/0xe0
? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1c0/0x1c0
ip_rcv+0x52/0xd0
? ip_rcv_finish_core.isra.20+0x380/0x380
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x7e/0x90
netif_receive_skb_internal+0x42/0xf0
napi_gro_receive+0xed/0x150
nfp_net_poll+0x7a2/0xd30 [nfp]
? kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x286/0x310
net_rx_action+0x149/0x3b0
__do_softirq+0xe3/0x30a
? handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6a/0x80
irq_exit+0xe8/0xf0
do_IRQ+0x85/0xd0
common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
</IRQ>
RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xbc/0x450
If I read this right strparser calls sock->ops->peek_len(sock), but the
sock->sk is already NULL. I'm guess this is because inet_release()
does:
sock->sk = NULL;
sk->sk_prot->close(sk, timeout);
And I don't really see a way for ktls to know that sock->sk is about to
be cleared, and therefore no way to stop strparser. Or for strparser
to always do the check, given tcp_peek_len() will do another dereference
of sock->sk :S
That's mostly a guess, it takes me half an hour of ktls connections
running to repro.
Any advice would be appreciated.. Can we move the sock->sk assignment
after close?..
diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
index 5183a2daba64..aff93e7cdb31 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -428,8 +428,8 @@ int inet_release(struct socket *sock)
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_LINGER) &&
!(current->flags & PF_EXITING))
timeout = sk->sk_lingertime;
- sock->sk = NULL;
sk->sk_prot->close(sk, timeout);
+ sock->sk = NULL;
}
return 0;
}
I don't see IPv6 clearing this pointer, perhaps we don't have to?
We tested it and it seems to works, but this is pre-git code, so
it's hard to tell what the reason to clear was :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists