[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f65b53b4-ecbf-a35b-2da8-2722b063e8b3@denx.de>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 00:42:04 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] net: phy: tja11xx: Add TJA11xx PHY driver
On 5/23/19 12:14 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:48:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 5/18/19 4:14 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 01:51:23AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> Add driver for the NXP TJA1100 and TJA1101 PHYs. These PHYs are special
>>>> BroadRReach 100BaseT1 PHYs used in automotive.
>>>
>>> Hi Marek
>>>
>>>> + }, {
>>>> + PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_TJA1101),
>>>> + .name = "NXP TJA1101",
>>>> + .features = PHY_BASIC_T1_FEATURES,
>>>
>>> One thing i would like to do before this patch goes in is define
>>> ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT1_Full_BIT in ethtool.h, and use it here.
>>> We could not do it earlier because were ran out of bits. But with
>>> PHYLIB now using bitmaps, rather than u32, we can.
>>
>> So now that "[PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: T1 support" is posted, does
>> this patch require any change ? I don't think it does ?
>
> Hi Marek
>
> In the end, no it does not need any changes because of my patchset.
OK, thanks.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
Powered by blists - more mailing lists