[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190522060746.30074-1-andreas.oetken@siemens.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 08:07:46 +0200
From: Andreas Oetken <andreas.oetken@...mens.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: andreas@...ken.name, m-karicheri2@...com, a-kramer@...com,
Andreas Oetken <andreas.oetken@...mens.com>,
Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@...en.se>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] hsr: fix don't prune the master node from the node_db
Don't prune master node in the hsr_prune_nodes function.
Neither time_in[HSR_PT_SLAVE_A], nor time_in[HSR_PT_SLAVE_B],
will ever be updated by hsr_register_frame_in for the master port.
Thus the master node will be repeatedly pruned leading to
repeated packet loss.
This bug never appeared because the hsr_prune_nodes function
was only called once. Since commit 5150b45fd355
("net: hsr: Fix node prune function for forget time expiry") this issue
is fixed unvealing the issue described above.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Oetken <andreas.oetken@...mens.com>
---
net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c b/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c
index 9fa9abd83018..2d7a19750436 100644
--- a/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c
+++ b/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c
@@ -365,6 +365,14 @@ void hsr_prune_nodes(struct timer_list *t)
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(node, &hsr->node_db, mac_list) {
+ /* Don't prune own node. Neither time_in[HSR_PT_SLAVE_A]
+ * nor time_in[HSR_PT_SLAVE_B], will ever be updated for
+ * the master port. Thus the master node will be repeatedly
+ * pruned leading to packet loss.
+ */
+ if (hsr_addr_is_self(hsr, node->macaddress_A))
+ continue;
+
/* Shorthand */
time_a = node->time_in[HSR_PT_SLAVE_A];
time_b = node->time_in[HSR_PT_SLAVE_B];
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists