[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ce497cb-f121-7f73-e39f-a0474a33bc90@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 12:02:00 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Andreas Oetken <andreas.oetken@...mens.com>
Cc: andreas@...ken.name, m-karicheri2@...com, a-kramer@...com,
Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@...en.se>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] hsr: fix don't prune the master node from the node_db
Hello!
On 23.05.2019 10:02, Andreas Oetken wrote:
> Don't prune master node in the hsr_prune_nodes function.
> Neither time_in[HSR_PT_SLAVE_A], nor time_in[HSR_PT_SLAVE_B],
> will ever be updated by hsr_register_frame_in for the master port.
> Thus the master node will be repeatedly pruned leading to
> repeated packet loss.
> This bug never appeared because the hsr_prune_nodes function
> was only called once. Since commit 5150b45fd355
> ("net: hsr: Fix node prune function for forget time expiry") this issue
> is fixed unvealing the issue described above.
^^^^^^^^^
My spellchecker trips on this word. I think it should be either
"unveiling" or "revealing"...
> Fixes: 5150b45fd355 ("net: hsr: Fix node prune function for forget time expiry")
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Oetken <andreas.oetken@...mens.com>
> Tested-by: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists