netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 5/9] net: phylink: Add phylink_create

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+h21hpU7-kcsX9Z4DA116qcMz2DjE3G2Fwj03=JDRyE7sAcwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 01:04:01 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com" <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 5/9] net: phylink: Add phylink_create_raw

On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 00:55, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:20:40AM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> > +     if (pl->ops) {
> > +             pl->ops->mac_link_up(ndev, pl->link_an_mode,
> >                            pl->phy_state.interface,
> >                            pl->phydev);
> >
> > +             netif_carrier_on(ndev);
> >
> > +             netdev_info(ndev,
> > +                         "Link is Up - %s/%s - flow control %s\n",
> > +                         phy_speed_to_str(link_state.speed),
> > +                         phy_duplex_to_str(link_state.duplex),
> > +                         phylink_pause_to_str(link_state.pause));
> > +     } else {
> > +             blocking_notifier_call_chain(&pl->notifier_chain,
> > +                                          PHYLINK_MAC_LINK_UP, &info);
> > +             phydev_info(pl->phydev,
> > +                         "Link is Up - %s/%s - flow control %s\n",
> > +                         phy_speed_to_str(link_state.speed),
> > +                         phy_duplex_to_str(link_state.duplex),
> > +                         phylink_pause_to_str(link_state.pause));
> > +     }
>
> So if we don't have pl->ops, what happens when we call phydev_info()
> with a NULL phydev, which is a very real possibility: one of phylink's
> whole points is to support dynamic presence of a PHY.
>
> What will happen in that case is this will oops, due to dereferencing
> an offset NULL pointer via:
>
> #define phydev_info(_phydev, format, args...)   \
>         dev_info(&_phydev->mdio.dev, format, ##args)
>
> You can't just decide that if there's no netdev, we will be guaranteed
> a phy.
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
> According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

True, however it does not crash:

[    2.539949] (NULL device *): Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control off

I agree that a better printing system has to be established though.

-Vladimir