lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <698c672e-f818-4b66-ebfc-e0b33964dec0@netronome.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 10:47:02 +0100
From:   Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
To:     Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "oss-drivers@...ronome.com" <oss-drivers@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] libbpf: add bpf_object__load_xattr() API
 function to pass log_level

2019-05-23 16:29 UTC+0000 ~ Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> 
> 
> On 5/23/19 9:19 AM, Yonghong Song wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/23/19 3:54 AM, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>>> libbpf was recently made aware of the log_level attribute for programs,
>>> used to specify the level of information expected to be dumped by the
>>> verifier.
>>>
>>> Create an API function to pass additional attributes when loading a
>>> bpf_object, so we can set this log_level value in programs when loading
>>> them, and so that so that applications relying on libbpf but not calling
>> "so that so that" => "so that"

Oh, thanks!

>>> bpf_prog_load_xattr() can also use that feature.
>>
>> Do not fully understand the above statement. From the code below,
>> I did not see how the non-zero log_level can be set for bpf_program
>> without bpf_prog_load_xattr(). Maybe I miss something?

bpf_prog_load_xattr() already had support for passing a log_level, it
was added by Alexei when he made libbpf aware of the different log
levels (commit da11b417583e). But bpftool does not rely on
bpf_prog_load_xattr(), it loads programs with bpf_object__load(), that
offered no way pass a log_level parameter. Does that help?

> 
> Looks like next patch uses it when -d is specified.

It uses the new bpf_object__load_xattr() function introduced in this
patch indeed.

> Probably commit message can be made more clear.

Yeah, probably. I'll improve it and submit a v3.

Thanks!
Quentin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ