[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB2800D7A42DB0D6E3E0A63F5AE0020@VI1PR0402MB2800.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 10:52:10 +0000
From: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com" <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
"olteanv@...il.com" <olteanv@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/9] net: phy: Add phy_standalone sysfs entry
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/9] net: phy: Add phy_standalone sysfs entry
>
>
>
> On 5/22/2019 6:20 PM, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> > Export a phy_standalone device attribute that is meant to give the
> > indication that this PHY lacks an attached_dev and its corresponding
> > sysfs link.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
>
> I would rather have that attribute be conditionally visible/created upon a PHY
> device being associated with a NULL net_device and not have it for "non-
> standalone" PHY devices, that would be confusing.
>
Ok, I understand the reasoning and will change it in v2.
--
Ioana
> > ---
> > drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c index 25cc7c33f8dd..30e0e73d5f86 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > @@ -537,10 +537,22 @@ phy_has_fixups_show(struct device *dev, struct
> > device_attribute *attr, } static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(phy_has_fixups);
> >
> > +static ssize_t phy_standalone_show(struct device *dev,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > + char *buf)
> > +{
> > + struct phy_device *phydev = to_phy_device(dev);
> > +
> > + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", !phydev->attached_dev); }
> > +
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(phy_standalone);
> > +
> > static struct attribute *phy_dev_attrs[] = {
> > &dev_attr_phy_id.attr,
> > &dev_attr_phy_interface.attr,
> > &dev_attr_phy_has_fixups.attr,
> > + &dev_attr_phy_standalone.attr,
> > NULL,
> > };
> > ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(phy_dev);
> >
>
> --
> Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists