lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 25 May 2019 00:26:35 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, mlxsw@...lanox.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
        saeedm@...lanox.com, leon@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 3/7] mlxfw: Propagate error messages through
 extack

Fri, May 24, 2019 at 05:54:46PM CEST, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>On Fri, 24 May 2019 10:11:10 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:19:46PM CEST, dsahern@...il.com wrote:
>> >On 5/23/19 3:45 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:  
>> >> @@ -57,11 +58,13 @@ static int mlxfw_fsm_state_wait(struct mlxfw_dev *mlxfw_dev, u32 fwhandle,
>> >>  	if (fsm_state_err != MLXFW_FSM_STATE_ERR_OK) {
>> >>  		pr_err("Firmware flash failed: %s\n",
>> >>  		       mlxfw_fsm_state_err_str[fsm_state_err]);
>> >> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Firmware flash failed");
>> >>  		return -EINVAL;
>> >>  	}
>> >>  	if (curr_fsm_state != fsm_state) {
>> >>  		if (--times == 0) {
>> >>  			pr_err("Timeout reached on FSM state change");
>> >> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Timeout reached on FSM state change");  
>> >
>> >FSM? Is the meaning obvious to users?  
>> 
>> It is specific to mlx drivers.
>
>What does it stand for?  Isn't it just Finite State Machine?

I believe so.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ