[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190525020736.gty5sdcu5jakffet@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 19:07:38 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com, davem@...emloft.net,
paul.burton@...s.com, udknight@...il.com, zlim.lnx@...il.com,
illusionist.neo@...il.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com,
sandipan@...ux.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 00/17] bpf: eliminate zero extensions for
sub-register writes
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:25:11PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
> v9:
> - Split patch 5 in v8.
> make bpf uapi header file sync a separate patch. (Alexei)
9th time's a charm? ;)
Applied.
Thanks a lot for all the hard work.
It's a great milestone.
Please follow up with an optimization for bpf_patch_insn_data()
to make it scaleable and undo that workaround in scale tests.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists