netdev - Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: use strlcpy() instead of strcpy()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190528122552.E8CD66087A@smtp.codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 12:25:52 +0000 (UTC)
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     neojou@...il.com
Cc:     arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com, franky.lin@...adcom.com,
        hante.meuleman@...adcom.com, chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com,
        wright.feng@...ress.com, davem@...emloft.net, rafal@...ecki.pl,
        hdegoedg@...hat.com, p.figiel@...lintechnologies.com,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...odcom.com,
        brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neo Jou <neojou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: use strlcpy() instead of strcpy()

neojou@...il.com wrote:

> From: Neo Jou <neojou@...il.com>
> 
> The function strcpy() is inherently not safe. Though the function
> works without problems here, it would be better to use other safer
> function, e.g. strlcpy(), to replace strcpy() still.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neo Jou <neojou@...il.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

bbfab331e3ab brcmfmac: use strlcpy() instead of strcpy()

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10953203/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches