lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16aff33f3e0.2764.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 18:09:16 +0200
From:   Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
CC:     Madhan Mohan R <MadhanMohan.R@...ress.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Chi-Hsien Lin" <chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        "linux-wireless" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Naveen Gupta <naveen.gupta@...ress.com>,
        Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ress.com>,
        <brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com>,
        Double Lo <double.lo@...ress.com>,
        Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] brcmfmac: re-enable command decode in sdio_aos for BRCM 4354

On May 28, 2019 5:52:10 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:18 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>>
>> > In commit 29f6589140a1 ("brcmfmac: disable command decode in
>> > sdio_aos") we disabled something called "command decode in sdio_aos"
>> > for a whole bunch of Broadcom SDIO WiFi parts.
>> >
>> > After that patch landed I find that my kernel log on
>> > rk3288-veyron-minnie and rk3288-veyron-speedy is filled with:
>> >   brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_sleep: error while changing bus sleep state -110
>> >
>> > This seems to happen every time the Broadcom WiFi transitions out of
>> > sleep mode.  Reverting the part of the commit that affects the WiFi on
>> > my boards fixes the problem for me, so that's what this patch does.
>> >
>> > Note that, in general, the justification in the original commit seemed
>> > a little weak.  It looked like someone was testing on a SD card
>> > controller that would sometimes die if there were CRC errors on the
>> > bus.  This used to happen back in early days of dw_mmc (the controller
>> > on my boards), but we fixed it.  Disabling a feature on all boards
>> > just because one SD card controller is broken seems bad.  ...so
>> > instead of just this patch possibly the right thing to do is to fully
>> > revert the original commit.
>> >
>> > Fixes: 29f6589140a1 ("brcmfmac: disable command decode in sdio_aos")
>> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>>
>> I don't see patch 2 in patchwork and I assume discussion continues.
>
> Apologies.  I made sure to CC you individually on all the patches but
> didn't think about the fact that you use patchwork to manage and so
> didn't ensure all patches made it to all lists (by default each patch
> gets recipients individually from get_maintainer).  I'll make sure to
> fix for patch set #2.  If you want to see all the patches, you can at
> least find them on lore.kernel.org linked from the cover:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1075373/
>
>
>> Please resend if/when I need to apply something.
>>
>> 2 patches set to Changes Requested.
>>
>> 10948785 [1/3] brcmfmac: re-enable command decode in sdio_aos for BRCM 4354
>
> As per Arend I'll change patch #1 to a full revert instead of a
> partial revert.  Arend: please yell if you want otherwise.

No yelling here. If any it is expected from Cypress. Maybe good to add them 
specifically in Cc:

Regards,
Arend


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ