netdev - [PATCH net 1/2] mlxsw: spectrum_acl: Avoid warning after identical rules insertion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190529075945.20050-2-idosch@idosch.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 10:59:44 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] mlxsw: spectrum_acl: Avoid warning after identical rules insertion

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>

When identical rules are inserted, the latter one goes to C-TCAM. For
that, a second eRP with the same mask is created. These 2 eRPs by the
nature cannot be merged and also one cannot be parent of another.
Teach mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_delta_fill() about this possibility and handle it
gracefully.

Reported-by: Alex Kushnarov <alexanderk@...lanox.com>
Fixes: c22291f7cf45 ("mlxsw: spectrum: acl: Implement delta for ERP")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_erp.c    | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_erp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_erp.c
index c1a9cc9a3292..4c98950380d5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_erp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_erp.c
@@ -1171,13 +1171,12 @@ mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_delta_fill(const struct mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_key *parent_key,
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	if (si == -1) {
-		/* The masks are the same, this cannot happen.
-		 * That means the caller is broken.
+		/* The masks are the same, this can happen in case eRPs with
+		 * the same mask were created in both A-TCAM and C-TCAM.
+		 * The only possible condition under which this can happen
+		 * is identical rule insertion. Delta is not possible here.
 		 */
-		WARN_ON(1);
-		*delta_start = 0;
-		*delta_mask = 0;
-		return 0;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	pmask = (unsigned char) parent_key->mask[__MASK_IDX(si)];
 	mask = (unsigned char) key->mask[__MASK_IDX(si)];
-- 
2.20.1