netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf 0/2] selftests: bpf: more sub-register zero extension unit tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e346c0c6-89dd-d04f-a0cf-60c15b2d2a8a@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 14:59:46 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc:     bjorn.topel@...el.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 0/2] selftests: bpf: more sub-register zero extension
 unit tests

On 05/29/2019 11:57 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
> JIT back-ends need to guarantee high 32-bit cleared whenever one eBPF insn
> write low 32-bit sub-register only. It is possible that some JIT back-ends
> have failed doing this and are silently generating wrong image.
> 
> This set completes the unit tests, so bug on this could be exposed.
> 
> Jiong Wang (2):
>   selftests: bpf: move sub-register zero extension checks into subreg.c
>   selftests: bpf: complete sub-register zero extension checks
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_instr.c |  39 --
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/subreg.c      | 533 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 533 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/subreg.c

Looks good, thanks for following up! Applied, thanks!