netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] introduce two new tracepoints for udp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQLtZ0oih5cd7FFq8-tQO1N4NR7K5KO9wCvhtFcsJ_=-uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 07:33:57 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] introduce two new tracepoints for udp

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 6:10 AM Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> This series introduces two new tracepoints trace_udp_send and
> trace_udp_queue_rcv, and removes redundant new line from
> tcp_event_sk_skb.

Though I like new tracepoints this patch set gets a nack, since commit log
says nothing about use case. Why kprobes cannot achieve the same?