netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Fix issues with vmalloc flush flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190528.172327.2113097810388476996.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 17:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        namit@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Fix issues with vmalloc flush flag

From: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 14:10:56 -0700

> These two patches address issues with the recently added
> VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS vmalloc flag.
> 
> Patch 1 addresses an issue that could cause a crash after other
> architectures besides x86 rely on this path.
> 
> Patch 2 addresses an issue where in a rare case strange arguments
> could be provided to flush_tlb_kernel_range(). 

It just occurred to me another situation that would cause trouble on
sparc64, and that's if someone the address range of the main kernel
image ended up being passed to flush_tlb_kernel_range().

That would flush the locked kernel mapping and crash the kernel
instantly in a completely non-recoverable way.