[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbce798b-a063-be24-a8ad-6fdb3aef8782@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 11:55:45 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 7/9] Add support for nexthop objects
On 5/30/19 11:52 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019 20:17:44 -0700
> David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> +
>> +static void print_nh_gateway(FILE *fp, const struct nhmsg *nhm,
>> + const struct rtattr *rta)
>> +{
>> + const char *gateway = format_host_rta(nhm->nh_family, rta);
>> +
>> + if (is_json_context())
>> + print_string(PRINT_JSON, "gateway", NULL, gateway);
>> + else {
>> + fprintf(fp, "via ");
>
> I was trying to get rid of all use of /fprintf(fp, / since it was
> indication of non-json code and fp is always stdout.
>
> Maybe
> print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "via ", NULL);
> print_color_string(PRINT_ANY, ifa_family_color(nhm->nh_family),
> "gateway", "%s ", format_host_rta(nhm->nh_family, rta));
>
>
>
>
The above is consistent with print_rta_gateway in ip/iproute.c. Since
the only difference between the 2 is the header struct, I will change
print_rta_gateway to take the address family over rtmsg and re-use it
for both paths.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists