netdev - Re: [net-next,v4 0/2] Enable SFP on ACPI based systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190531120513.GB18608@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 14:05:13 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ruslan Babayev <ruslan@...ayev.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,v4 0/2] Enable SFP on ACPI based systems

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 08:48:42AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > > Are you happy for the i2c patch to be merged via net-next?
> > 
> > Yes, that's fine my me.
> > 
> > Wolfram do you have any objections?
> 
> That's fine with me, I'd like an immutable branch, though. There are
> likely other changes to i2c.h coming and that would avoid merge
> conflicts.

Hi Wolfram

Davids Millers net-next is immutable, but large.

Maybe he can create a smaller immutable branch for you.

      Andrew