netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 18:15:22 +0200
From:   Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:     laurentiu.tudor@....com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, madalin.bucur@....com, roy.pledge@....com,
        camelia.groza@....com, leoyang.li@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joakim.Tjernlund@...inera.com,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

Hi Laurentiu,

Am 30.05.19 um 16:19 schrieb laurentiu.tudor@....com:
> This patch series contains several fixes in preparation for SMMU
> support on NXP LS1043A and LS1046A chips. Once these get picked up,
> I'll submit the actual SMMU enablement patches consisting in the
> required device tree changes.

Have you thought through what will happen if this patch ordering is not
preserved? In particular, a user installing a future U-Boot update with
the DTB bits but booting a stable kernel without this patch series -
wouldn't that regress dpaa then for our customers?

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)