[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190601130223.5ef947fa@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 13:02:23 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
Cc: toke@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
magnus.karlsson@...el.com, brouer@...hat.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
saeedm@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] net: xdp: refactor XDP_QUERY_PROG{,_HW}
to netdev
On Fri, 31 May 2019 11:42:14 +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 44b47e9df94a..f3a875a52c6c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -1940,6 +1940,9 @@ struct net_device {
> #endif
> struct hlist_node index_hlist;
>
> + struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog_hw;
IDK if we should pay the cost of this pointer for every netdev on the
system just for the single production driver out there that implements
HW offload :( I'm on the fence about this..
> + u32 xdp_flags;
> +
> /*
> * Cache lines mostly used on transmit path
> */
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index adcc045952c2..5e396fd01d8b 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -1360,42 +1360,44 @@ static int rtnl_fill_link_ifmap(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static u32 rtnl_xdp_prog_skb(struct net_device *dev)
> +static unsigned int rtnl_xdp_mode_to_flag(u8 tgt_mode)
> {
> - const struct bpf_prog *generic_xdp_prog;
> -
> - ASSERT_RTNL();
> -
> - generic_xdp_prog = rtnl_dereference(dev->xdp_prog);
> - if (!generic_xdp_prog)
> - return 0;
> - return generic_xdp_prog->aux->id;
> -}
> -
> -static u32 rtnl_xdp_prog_drv(struct net_device *dev)
> -{
> - return __dev_xdp_query(dev, dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf, XDP_QUERY_PROG);
> + switch (tgt_mode) {
> + case XDP_ATTACHED_DRV:
> + return XDP_FLAGS_DRV_MODE;
> + case XDP_ATTACHED_SKB:
> + return XDP_FLAGS_SKB_MODE;
> + case XDP_ATTACHED_HW:
> + return XDP_FLAGS_HW_MODE;
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
>
> -static u32 rtnl_xdp_prog_hw(struct net_device *dev)
> +static u32 rtnl_xdp_mode_to_attr(u8 tgt_mode)
> {
> - return __dev_xdp_query(dev, dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf,
> - XDP_QUERY_PROG_HW);
> + switch (tgt_mode) {
> + case XDP_ATTACHED_DRV:
> + return IFLA_XDP_DRV_PROG_ID;
> + case XDP_ATTACHED_SKB:
> + return IFLA_XDP_SKB_PROG_ID;
> + case XDP_ATTACHED_HW:
> + return IFLA_XDP_HW_PROG_ID;
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int rtnl_xdp_report_one(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> - u32 *prog_id, u8 *mode, u8 tgt_mode, u32 attr,
> - u32 (*get_prog_id)(struct net_device *dev))
> + u32 *prog_id, u8 *mode, u8 tgt_mode)
> {
> u32 curr_id;
> int err;
>
> - curr_id = get_prog_id(dev);
> + curr_id = dev_xdp_query(dev, rtnl_xdp_mode_to_flag(tgt_mode));
> if (!curr_id)
> return 0;
>
> *prog_id = curr_id;
> - err = nla_put_u32(skb, attr, curr_id);
> + err = nla_put_u32(skb, rtnl_xdp_mode_to_attr(tgt_mode), curr_id);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> @@ -1420,16 +1422,13 @@ static int rtnl_xdp_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>
> prog_id = 0;
> mode = XDP_ATTACHED_NONE;
> - err = rtnl_xdp_report_one(skb, dev, &prog_id, &mode, XDP_ATTACHED_SKB,
> - IFLA_XDP_SKB_PROG_ID, rtnl_xdp_prog_skb);
> + err = rtnl_xdp_report_one(skb, dev, &prog_id, &mode, XDP_ATTACHED_SKB);
> if (err)
> goto err_cancel;
> - err = rtnl_xdp_report_one(skb, dev, &prog_id, &mode, XDP_ATTACHED_DRV,
> - IFLA_XDP_DRV_PROG_ID, rtnl_xdp_prog_drv);
> + err = rtnl_xdp_report_one(skb, dev, &prog_id, &mode, XDP_ATTACHED_DRV);
> if (err)
> goto err_cancel;
> - err = rtnl_xdp_report_one(skb, dev, &prog_id, &mode, XDP_ATTACHED_HW,
> - IFLA_XDP_HW_PROG_ID, rtnl_xdp_prog_hw);
> + err = rtnl_xdp_report_one(skb, dev, &prog_id, &mode, XDP_ATTACHED_HW);
> if (err)
> goto err_cancel;
>
So you remove all the attr and flag params just to add a conversion
helpers to get them based on mode? Why? Seems like unnecessary churn,
and questionable change :S
Otherwise looks good to me!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists