netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH] net: rtnetlink: Enslave device before bringing it up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 2 Jun 2019 12:33:19 +0200
From:   Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: rtnetlink: Enslave device before bringing
 it up

Hi David,

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 02:26:15PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
> Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 15:51:20 +0200
> 
> > Unlike with bridges, one can't add an interface to a bond and set it up
> > at the same time:
> > 
> > | # ip link set dummy0 down
> > | # ip link set dummy0 master bond0 up
> > | Error: Device can not be enslaved while up.
> > 
> > Of all drivers with ndo_add_slave callback, bond and team decline if
> > IFF_UP flag is set, vrf cycles the interface (i.e., sets it down and
> > immediately up again) and the others just don't care.
> > 
> > Support the common notion of setting the interface up after enslaving it
> > by sorting the operations accordingly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
> 
> What about other flags like IFF_PROMISCUITY?

Crap, that's the crux: Upon enslaving, team driver propagates
IFF_PROMISC and IFF_ALLMULTI flags from master to slave. With my change,
these propagations roll back by accident. So please disregard this
patch, I'll have to find a different solution.

Thanks, Phil