[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190603150126.GE19627@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 17:01:26 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rasmus Villemoes <Rasmus.Villemoes@...vas.se>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 06/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement
port_set_speed for mv88e6250
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 02:42:19PM +0000, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> The data sheet also mentions the possibility of selecting 200 Mbps for
> the MII ports (ports 5 and 6) by setting the ForceSpd field to
> 0x2 (aka MV88E6065_PORT_MAC_CTL_SPEED_200). However, there's a note
> that "actual speed is determined by bit 8 above", and flipping back a
> page, one finds that bits 13:8 are reserved...
>
> So without further information on what bit 8 means, let's stick to
> supporting just 10 and 100 Mbps on all ports.
200Mbps is also somewhat Marvell Proprietary. I've not seen any other
vendors interfaces supporting it. So i don't think anybody will really
miss it.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists