netdev - Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: add support for matching IPv4 options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190602022706.GA24477@ubuntu>
Date:   Sat, 1 Jun 2019 22:27:06 -0400
From:   Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@...il.com>
To:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:     netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: add support for matching IPv4 options

On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 02:30:06PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > I developed this patchset to suit my employer needs and there is no plan
> > for a follow up patchset, however I think non-zero offset might be useful
> > in the future for tunneled packets.
> 
> For tunneled traffic, we can store the network offset in the
> nft_pktinfo object. Then, add a new extension to update this network
> offset to point to the network offset inside the tunnel header, and
> use this pkt->network_offset everywhere.

OK. I'm changing so that offset isn't being used as input. But, it's
still being passed as reference for output. See further response
below...

> I think this new IPv4 options extension should use priv->offset to
> match fields inside the IPv4 option specifically, just like in the
> IPv6 extensions and TCP options do. If you look on how the
> priv->offset is used in the existing code, this offset points to
> values that the specific option field conveys.

I believe that's what I have coded:

	err = ipv4_find_option(nft_net(pkt), skb, &offset, priv->type, NULL, NULL);
	if (priv->flags & NFT_EXTHDR_F_PRESENT) {
		*dest = (err >= 0);
		return;
	} else if (err < 0) {
		goto err;
	}
	offset += priv->offset;

offset is returned as the offset where it matches the sought priv->type
then priv->offset is added to get to the right field between the offset.

If this is satisfactory, I can submit v2 of the kernel patch.

Thanks,

Stephen.