[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEA6p_CixzdRNUa46YZusFg-37MFAVqQ8D09rxVU5Nja6gO1SA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:05:45 -0700
From: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
idosch@...lanox.com, saeedm@...lanox.com,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 4/7] ipv6: Plumb support for nexthop object in
a fib6_info
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:35 PM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/3/19 3:58 PM, Wei Wang wrote:
> > Hmm... I am still a bit concerned with the ip6_create_rt_rcu() call.
> > If we have a blackholed nexthop, the lookup code here always tries to
> > create an rt cache entry for every lookup.
> > Maybe we could reuse the pcpu cache logic for this? So we only create
> > new dst cache on the CPU if there is no cache created before.
>
> I'll take a look.
>
> Long term, I would like to see IPv6 separate FIB lookups from dst's -
> like IPv4 does. In that case reject routes would not use a dst_entry;
> rather the fib lookups return an error code.
Yes. Agree. That will be even better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists