[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e8d7a07-d350-9d12-189b-d3a1be8cc69d@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 17:30:34 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
Cc: Martin Lau <kafai@...com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"idosch@...lanox.com" <idosch@...lanox.com>,
"saeedm@...lanox.com" <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 4/7] ipv6: Plumb support for nexthop object in
a fib6_info
On 6/4/19 3:36 PM, Wei Wang wrote:
> instead of trying to convert ip6_create_rt_rcu() to use the pcpu_dst
> logic, completely get rid of the calling to ip6_create_rt_rcu(), and
> directly return f6i in those cases to the caller. Is that correct?
yes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists