[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9306.1559633653@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 08:34:13 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Igor Konopko <igor.j.konopko@...el.com>,
"Mohit P . Tahiliani" <tahiliani@...k.edu.in>,
Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Matias Bjorling <mb@...htnvm.io>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rxrpc: Fix uninitialized error code in rxrpc_send_data_packet()
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> I'm not such a big fan of BUG(), so I'd go for ret = -EAFNOSUPPORT, but given
> rxrpc is already full of BUG() calls, I guess it is an acceptable solution.
Okay. Are you okay with this going through net-next?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists