[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33c5afc8-f35a-b586-63a3-8409cd0049a2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 19:25:46 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Subject: Re: Cutting the link on ndo_stop - phy_stop or phy_disconnect?
On 6/4/2019 2:36 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> Normally the PHY receives traffic, and passes it to the MAC which
> just ignores the signals it receives from the PHY, so no processing
> beyond the PHY receiving the traffic happens.
>
> Ultimately, whether you want the PHY to stay linked or not linked
> is, imho, a policy that should be set by the administrator (consider
> where a system needs to become available quickly after boot vs a
> system where power saving is important.) We don't, however, have
> a facility to specify that policy though.
Maybe that's what we need, something like:
ip link set dev eth0 phy [on|off|wake]
or whatever we deem appropriate such that people willing to maintain the
PHY on can do that.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists