[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 14:42:18 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, f.fainelli@...il.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: marvell10g: allow PHY to probe without firmware
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 08:59:19AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 06:48:27PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> > Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 11:43:16 +0100
> >
> > > + (state == PHY_UP || state == PHY_RESUMING)) {
> >
> > drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c: In function ‘mv3310_link_change_notify’:
> > drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c:268:35: error: ‘PHY_RESUMING’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘RPM_RESUMING’?
> > (state == PHY_UP || state == PHY_RESUMING)) {
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > RPM_RESUMING
> > drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c:268:35: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > At top level:
> > drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c:262:13: warning: ‘mv3310_link_change_notify’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> > static void mv3310_link_change_notify(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Hmm. Looks like Heiner's changes in net-next _totally_ screw this
> approach - it's not just about PHY_RESUMING being removed, it's
> also about the link change notifier being moved. :(
Hi Russell
The link change notifier still seems to be called, and it is still
part of the phy_driver structure.
Please could you be more specific about what changes Heiner made which
causes this patch problems?
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists