[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:46:24 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] perf augmented_raw_syscalls: Support arm64 raw
syscalls
Em Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 10:38:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 05:48:44PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> > This patch adds support for arm64 raw syscall numbers so that we can use
> > it on arm64 platform.
> >
> > After applied this patch, we need to specify macro -D__aarch64__ or
> > -D__x86_64__ in compilation option so Clang can use the corresponding
> > syscall numbers for arm64 or x86_64 respectively, other architectures
> > will report failure when compilation.
>
> So, please check what I have in my perf/core branch, I've completely
> removed arch specific stuff from augmented_raw_syscalls.c.
>
> What is done now is use a map to specify what to copy, that same map
> that is used to state which syscalls should be traced.
>
> It uses that tools/perf/arch/arm64/entry/syscalls/mksyscalltbl to figure
> out the mapping of syscall names to ids, just like is done for x86_64
> and other arches, falling back to audit-libs when that syscalltbl thing
> is not present.
Also added:
Fixes: ac96287cae08 ("perf trace: Allow specifying a set of events to add in perfconfig")
For the stable@...nel.org folks to automagically pick this.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists