[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e12b390-9b47-ae24-3a1b-4f602c57a779@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 11:02:34 -0400
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: make debugging output more succinct
On 6/7/19 10:59 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Seeing bonding debug log data along the lines of "event: 5" is a bit spartan,
> and often requires a lookup table if you don't remember what every event is.
> Make use of netdev_cmd_to_name for an improved debugging experience, so for
> the prior example, you'll see: "bond_netdev_event received NETDEV_REGISTER"
> instead (both are prefixed with the device for which the event pertains).
>
> There are also quite a few places that the netdev_dbg output could stand to
> mention exactly which slave the message pertains to (gets messy if you have
> multiple slaves all spewing at once to know which one they pertain to).
Argh. Please drop this one, detritus in my git tree when I hit git
send-email caused this earlier iteration of patch 1 of the set this is
threaded with to go out.
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...hat.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists